Three of the four reviewers had made pretty I remember in particular editing Howe'sĮssay. Subjects in a variety of styles, and working with theĪuthors and reviewers has been a lot of fun.Įyal: For a long time-editing the second issue-I used to go The essays themselves have covered a wide range of Pleased with the way these issues have come together. Whether we've been unhappy with what we've published soįar, the answer is clearly "no": we've both been very Our basic patterns of thinking, one year of electronic If twenty years of poststructuralism haven't changed Theory and criticism, including the most innovative. What we've said about them could be said about all Standing pretty far back from the first three issues John: Well, wherever you go, there you are. Utopian and dystopian postmodernism, etc. Specifically those of classical and popular culture, Published tend to organize around familiar oppositions, Noted in both previous Postfaces that many works we've Writing that, in a way, much of this thinking does not Is especially noticeable that they think in suchįamiliar ways. (Fraiberg) or a new kind of writing (Acker, Ulmer), it Things, for a radical redefinition of personal context So many of these works argue for new ways of doing Way they would be hard to follow, maybe in the way that OfĬourse if they were saying something in an entirely new Innovative and interesting their subject matter. Structures of thinking, ways of being essays, however Seems that the essays we have published share certain But what kindsĮyal: The unforseen: a new way of making things work. Three issues _are_ conventional in their content, it'sīecause we rejected risk-taking essays. Rejected might argue that, to the extent that our first Still, the authors of some of the submissions we John: Well, I wouldn't say that our first three issues haveīeen _thoroughly_ conventional, but I know what you We've seen I'd have to guess that most people out thereĪre writing recognizable, assimilable essays. We did get some unconventional work, but from what Radical politically) if we had more of it to review. Published more radical work (not necessarily more A conventional journal that looks radical: Much of our success we must attribute to what mightįinally be the conventionality of our first three Received that many essays that took risks-I wonder how Hardware/software unless they raised "significantĮyal: True, though I was thinking about the effects of the Stipulate that we wouldn't consider essays on computer Something to do with computers but nothing to do with Had a number of submissions, at the beginning, that had Published, distributed and read on computers, it mustīe a journal _about_ computers-about its medium. Ran into when we explained the journal to people: theyĪlways seemed to expect that, because it was a journal Like one of the early and persistent misconceptions we John: In an odd way, though, that observation is very much Mean because they are in electronic form. But we have not seen too manyĮssays that think the way they do or mean what they Would lose at the very least the chance to exemplify Several of the essays do gain something from being in The electronic medium, but that has not happened much. a good number of them anyway-would be affected by Eodem modo typi, qui nunc nobis videntur parum clari, fiant sollemnes in futurum.Įyal: Last year we expected that the essays we would publish Mirum est notare quam littera gothica, quam nunc putamus parum claram, anteposuerit litterarum formas humanitatis per seacula quarta decima et quinta decima. Claritas est etiam processus dynamicus, qui sequitur mutationem consuetudium lectorum. Investigationes demonstraverunt lectores legere me lius quod ii legunt saepius. Typi non habent claritatem insitam est usus legentis in iis qui facit eorum claritatem. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |